You are here: Home » Social Media Marketing » The Myth of Social Media’s Transparency

The Myth of Social Media’s Transparency

by Scott Bishop on November 16, 2009


Social Media MarketingStrategy

handscovered

What Does Social Media Transparency Even Mean?

One of the big cheers for social media is it’s so called “Transparency”.
I find this assessment entirely misleading and false.

How on earth can a medium in which we have complete control over be transparent?  The answer is that it’s not.  handscovered

Over the weekend President Obama was asked about Twitter when talking with a group of Chinese students.   Obama was asked, “Do you know about the great firewall and should we be able to use Twitter?” His reply: “I have never used Twitter but I’m an advocate of technology and not restricting internet access.”

Never used Twitter?  WTF?  After all, Obama was absolutely masterful in his presidential campaign’s use of social media…it helped propel him from unknown to Front-runner.  His 2.6 million twitter followers have cheered his campaign’s pledge of transparency for using Twitter.  So how has someone with 2.6 million followers never used the service?

Social media allows the ability to be open, but transparancey implies I can see through the smoke and gives users more control.  But I still have complete control over my social media activities.

I control what is posted and projected.  I have control over the brand I wish to portray of myself.  I have control who is in my networks.  I have control over how I respond to both good and bad comments.

The wizard behind the curtain is the one I want you to see.

So what exactly is transparent about that?  The answer is that it’s not.
The power of social media lies in its ability to attract and connect with new audiences and in it’s ability for 2 way conversations and engagement.

Unfortunately, most brands focus on attracting the audience, but not the dialogue and engagement.

So in most cases with companies and brands…Social media is no more transparent than a television or radio commercial.  You get no more understanding of who they are or what they’re like in real person than you would with a print ad.

So just what is this transparency everyone is talking about?  It’s the potential.  And just as with anything, not everyone…in fact most brands and companies do not live up or even acknowledge this potential.

Some do, and those companies are reaping big rewards and creating virtual armies of folks who not only loyally buy their products…but encourage others to do the same.

I have gotten to know some truly great people, many of which I consider dear friends from social media.  These are folks who are using social media for advancing business opportunities…but who show a human element and personality.

Transparency implies you can see through something.  What you should strive for in your businesses social media activities is not for us to see through you…but for people to see you as you are.

Commentators and marketers are correct in their understanding of the potential of social media…they’re just using the wrong terms.

Get the Real Time Marketer Directly to Your RSS HERE

Scott S. Bishop is editor for Real Time Marketer and a marketing strategist with a specialty in social media.  He is an avid blogger and active across the net.  He is @thescottbishop on Twitter

Related posts:

  1. Social Media Tool: How and Why You Should Use URL Shortener Su.pr This weeks tool is the URL Shortener from Stumble Upon,...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

  • Like I said, falsehoods will be found out. Lies will be brought to light. Liars can be pointed out. Transparency is a choice (just like votes). ;-)

    Social Media is not transparent; people who use it can be (or not). "Transparency implies I can see through the smoke...". No, transparency implies that there is no (intentional) smoke to see through.

    Knowledge does not equal control. But knowledge of an untruth can. The control the users have is to give their attention to those being honest (open, transparent) and not those who aren't.

    At the end of the day, we agree; let people see you as you are, the good, the bad, the ugly... be real.

    Good stuff, Scott.
  • sbishop
    As we talked about earlier, I don't want you thinking my intention was to mislead anyone through social tools. Brands that are dishonest in social media and offline, will rightfully be torn apart online. I appreciate your definition of transparency, and we mostly agree.

    But brands utilize social media as a way to mold perception and emotions about their company and products. I don't see it much differently than other more traditional mediums. I think the impact can be more powerful and the tools should be used to reach a personal connection to customers...but at the end of the day brands are still only going to let you see what they want you to.

    The same goes for personal branding online. I don't see the benefit of airing dirty laundry. If you're fixing a known customer service issue that's one thing, but spilling bad beans just for the sake of openness doesn't make sense to me.

    Thanks for the lively debate!
  • Dammit, I say transparency all the time, but you're right, it's not the correct term. Openness? Inclusion?
  • sbishop
    We all say transparency Tyler, it's burned into our brains. I don't necessarily think we need to change the lingo because that's a battle that's basically impossible because the "guru's" all use "transparency" and therefore so do the masses. But I do def think we need to change way our clients understand it. That's a battle we can win.
  • Real transparency is only achieved by lifecasting 24/7.
  • sbishop
    Agreed. I think the "transparency" brands need is to find a nice balance of offering some personality to truly connect with customers and actual value on social networks. I think they're often caught in a state of limbo and don't know what to "talk about" or just spew press releases and product info.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post:

Web Analytics