3 Reasons The Groupon Super Bowl Backlash Is Bullshit

by Scott Bishop on February 9, 2011

If you were offended by the Groupon ads then you certainly are not alone. There is a large backlash that starting gathering steam as soon as the ads aired on Super Bowl Sunday. There is much reporting on this by mainstream outlets like the Wall Street Journal and the LA Times, and it seems everyone has an opinion.

The lines in the Groupon sand are drawing, and the official Groupon statement and responses don’t seem to be calming people down. You either are pissed off, or apparently got “the joke”.

I don’t know whether or not the ads were offensive, that’s a subjective term.  But I do know that none of this is going to hurt Groupon in the long run.

And I know this because most of the backlash is bullshit.  Here’s why.

3. Selective Outrage And Hypocrisy

So let’s go over this just to be sure. An offensive advertisement and all future business transactions are off…but you’re perfectly ok with watching a game that showcases a quarterback recently accused of sexual assault?

I’m happy to jump on board with important social issues but it’s ironic to me that you are able to be fine with watching big Ben play, as long as the TV time outs aren’t deemed off taste.

(The Super Bowl has also featured such stars as Ray Lewis, accused of double homicide resulting in an out of court civil agreement.  Leonard Little, convicted of vehicular manslaughter. Ect.)

Also, Lipton Ice Tea and Chrysler have mostly been praised in their spots in which they both used Eminem as a corporate spokesperson. I don’t need to go down the list of the “offensive” controversy he creates.

If you’re going to choose not to do business with Groupon, I find it strange you have no problem supporting all the other businesses most others would consider much more “off taste’.

2.  It’s easy to slam a company you can Still Do business with anonymously

Jumping in on the band wagon is easy.  It’s even easier to do it when you can still do business with that company and nobody will know about it.

What percentage of this so called backlash has unsubscribed from Groupon’s email list?  I’m guessing not as many that bitch about it on Twitter or Facebook.  I’m confident to say that a large majority of those who claim to be offended will drop their anger as soon as the right 50% off deal falls in their inbox.

1.  People Like Saving Money More Than Saving Pandas

If you were offended by the Groupon Super Bowl ads you’re going to be more offended that people care more about saving money than saving rain forests, or saving whales, or saving Tibet. If people like your product, they’ll eventually overlook those little bloopers in your company history, like helping to build the Nazi war machine – BMW)

If Ben Roethlisberger can play in a Super Bowl the same year he was accused of rape and be totally ok except for a few late night talk show jokes, then Groupon will mount this storm.  The public has an attention span shorter than Charlie Sheen lasts in rehab.

So while Groupon may take a hit in the court of public approval in the short run, they’re going to ride this wave because ultimately they produce a product that people want.

Something later down the road may eventually lead to their demise, like arrogance, but it surely won’t be from a few ads that seem to have missed their mark.

Scott S. Bishop is editor for Real Time Marketer and is the Director of Social for an integrated marketing firm.  He is an avid blogger and active across the net.  He is @thescottbishop on Twitter

If You Like This Post, You Will Find These Valuable Too

  • http://twitter.com/ablemike Mike Bishop

    Could not agree with you more.

  • http://twitter.com/jimmydoestea Jim S.

    Lots of agreement from me. Good post.

  • http://twitter.com/kristy Kristy Bolsinger

    Point #2 – Pretty sure you mean anonymously, rather than unanimously.

    But yes. I completely agree with many of your points here. Especially #2. I think people do enjoy saving money more than giving money to causes. The reason this largely struck a nerve is because it’s truth.

  • http://twitter.com/TheMurphDogg Brian Murphy

    As a Real Time Marketer you should know the difference between “unanimously” and “anonymously”.

  • Anonymous

    I’m not a Real Time Spelling Checker.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention 3 Reasons The Groupon Super Bowl Backlash Is Bullshit | Real Time Marketer -- Topsy.com

  • http://twitter.com/TheMurphDogg Brian Murphy

    (And Rey Lewis vs. Ray Louis)

    But as for the Groupon ad, you can’t call people hypocrites for not liking the groupon ads yet watching a game that fields players whose off-the-field issues are legally suspect. Are you saying that I can’t like the Seinfeld TV show because Michael Richards blasted insensitive jokes that got him in trouble?

    Groupon did a terrible job in choosing this campaign as evidenced by the backlash. Now they have to live with the results

  • http://americandelusion.blogspot.com/ patrick Mahoney

    B.S.???

    FYI, Groupon’s $15 BILLION IPO is now going down the toilet.

    Read that in Wall Street Journal, btw. How is that for a quick Karmic Return? ;-)

    We will see a lot more than backpedaling from them in the next few weeks. They will next try to buy their way into good graces…but no one is going to take the bait.

    Using genocide to create buzz got them more than they expected. Now its the buzz-saw ;-o

    Its sad for Groupon, but inevitable.

    Not all money is good money. To the whales? They don’t care if you ridicule them, and their plight. But to 6 million surviving Tibetans, who have seen many millions tortured, imprisoned, and killed??? Its not worth the few bucks these greedy connivers will throw their way….maybe. Just note that the genocide in Tibet is as bad or worse than the Jews in WWII, they just haven’t talked about it. Fearing worse from China, INC..

    Crispin Porter + Bogusky & Groupon minimized that; just to leverage the $6 Billion Google Offer to $15 Billion public offering. Well, anyone with a conscience isn’t going to buy that stock. Its not only wrong, but look how clueless they are in dealing with China. I wouldn’t give my money to such slap stick, fly by night, Wall Street Opportunists. Would you?

    Crispin Porter + Bogusky & Groupon see themselves as clever provocateurs; when in fact they are sad hypocrites.

    Trying to buy a Charity Org shield to gain credibility is impossible at this point, they were blatant, shameless, and even proud of being #1 Twit-err; until the double edge of the sword revealed itself.

    If the I.P.O. is to work, they have to change their name…again ;-)

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for the catch, appreciated. I’m not saying I think it’s a great thing and I’m not defending Groupon’s ads…I’m only pointing out where I see the hypocrisy.

  • Anonymous

    I celebrate this country so you have the right to like anything you want. My point is not to defend Groupon or their ads. My point is that people care about causes up to the point where it breaks their convenience tipping point. After that they let things slide they normally would not. If your tipping point is to not stop watching Seinfeld reruns then so be it.

    But based on this philosophy I don’t think that Groupon will be decimated by this in the long run.

  • Anonymous

    If the 15 Billion dollar IPO is in jeopardy, it’s because it was over valuated from the git go. Which very well may be the case. But if it wasn’t, and is falsely devalued based on a PR nightmare, then those early buyers will thank those commercials to the bank.

    I think the commercials were dumb. That’s not my point.

    How many of those “outraged” ever spent a dollar on helping Tibet? How many of those outraged ever spent five minutes helping to spread the cause of the Tibetan people? And how many of those outraged and even if they quit buying Groupons will change one single buying habit and quit purchasing cheap Chinese goods which are the real plight of that country? My guess is very few.

    And I’m only trying to point that out. Thanks for the comment.

  • http://www.elizabethsmithson.com ElizabethSmithson

    I thought the ads were brilliant…I love in Groupon’s official statement how they mention that they wanted to highlight the sillyness of saving a few bucks vs. global causes…I think people can go ahead and eaaaase up, no?

    I completely agree with all your points, for sure.

  • http://restlesslikeme.com Norcross

    Well, I’ve never signed up for Groupon. And I saw the ads, and thought…meh. Didn’t do much for me, but I wasn’t offended. And I believe your point is right on, that folks will forget quickly and move on, esp. when they care about saving money. Will it hurt them? Maybe. Did they get the reach they wanted? Probably not. Numbers say they got 50,000 new “users” (which didn’t say businesses using it or subscribers). 50k out of the total super bowl viewership works out to less than half a percent (0.045%). That’s a horrible opt-in rate.

  • Pingback: Groupon's Super Bowl Ads: DATA on the Backlash Bandwagon | Columbus Social Media + Social Media Strategist | Nate Riggs & Social Business Strategies

  • Anonymous

    Appreciate that Mike. Thanks for the comment, and kudos to a wonderful last name!!

  • Anonymous

    Thanks much for the comment, seems that the the camps of support vs hate ran pretty deep. This whole thing has been fascinating to watch from a PR perspective.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah I think their bit at sarcasm seemed to be huge misread. I was surprised at the backlash considering some of the other things that go on at the Super Bowl, hence the post. But this will be a case study for folks to look at for years to come. I hope this does not mean that advertisers will stop taking risks and go completely safe with their ads. That would make for one boring evening of commercials. Thanks for the comment Elizabeth.

  • Anonymous

    Unfortunately your numbers are way to common sense for advertising. You’re forgetting the almighty “reach” measurement which is the only reason this game can charge such ridiculous’ prices for an ad. If conversion rates were measured or “cars sold” they wouldn’t be able to charge much.
    I’ve never really understood how any advertiser can justify the cost of a Super Bowl ad. That’s an awful lot of Coke Zeros they need to sell. Obviously people drink Coke, but do they drink it because of crappy firework breathing dragons during the two minute warning?

  • http://www.jeffgswanson.com Jeff Swanson

    I agree with you completely on this. And I also like the Charlie Sheen jab you threw in there.

    Everyone has always been a critic, it’s just more viral now that we have social media channels. It’s sorta crazy to see how cynical so many people are though. I believe Elizabeth is right. Everyone needs to relax. It was a joke for crying out loud. A bad one, but a joke none the less. Have some fun with it! And to all the naysayers, look on the bright side, Groupon ended up donating a bunch of money to these causes, which is great.

    But I, for one, am not gonna pass up a perfectly good 15-for30 mani-pedi if one comes my way.

Previous post:

Next post:

Real Time Web Analytics